Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants

When deciding how to restore missing teeth, comparing Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants is the most critical first step. Modern dentistry offers fantastic pathways to bring back your natural biting power and confident smile. Understanding how these distinct methodologies function allows you to choose the absolute best path for your oral health.

Before you read further, one distinction clears up most of the confusion patients have about this topic:

Immediate placement means the implant post is inserted into the jawbone on the same day the tooth is extracted. Immediate loading means a crown (usually temporary) is attached to that post on the same day. These are two separate clinical decisions a patient can have immediate placement with a delayed crown, or, less commonly, a delayed placement with rapid loading afterward. Most "same-day implant" marketing blends the two together, but a Doctor evaluates them independently based on bone quality and stability at the time of surgery.

Traditional vs. Immediate Dental Implants Quick Summary

• Traditional implants separate extraction, bone healing (3–6 months), implant placement, and crown attachment into distinct stages, prioritizing maximum bone stability.

• Immediate implants place the post into the extraction socket the same day, and often attach a temporary crown the same visit, compressing treatment into a single trip.

• Candidacy for immediate placement depends heavily on bone density, gum health, and absence of active infection it is not suitable for every patient.

• Long-term survival data shows the two methods converge in outcomes when candidates are properly screened, though some cohort studies show wider gaps at the 5–6 year mark.

• A single implant with crown typically costs £1,800–£4,500 in the UK or €1,400–€3,500 in Germany, versus a considerably lower range at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey using the same international implant brands.

Introduction to Dental Implants

A modern smile restoration focuses on providing permanent stability and a completely natural appearance. In the specialized field of restorative dentistry, analyzing Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants helps patients choose the right solution. Advanced treatment options ensure that individuals regain full chewing functions while completely upgrading their long-term facial aesthetics. Elite care facilities like dental implants in Turkey at Vitrin Clinic utilize these biocompatible structures to secure beautiful, highly durable replacement crowns.

What Are Dental Implants?

A dental implant is an advanced medical device designed to permanently replace the root structure of a lost tooth. When choosing your therapy, understanding this fundamental anchor mechanism is very helpful. Elite care facilities like Vitrin Clinic in Turkey utilize these biocompatible structures to secure beautiful, highly durable replacement crowns.

Basic components of dental implants

The basic components of dental implants consist of three essential pieces designed to replicate a natural tooth structure. First, the implant post is a biocompatible titanium screw surgically embedded into the jawbone to serve as a secure root foundation. Next, the abutment is attached on top of this post to act as a durable connector bridge. Finally, a custom-made ceramic crown is securely placed over the abutment, perfectly restoring the visible biting surface and aesthetic look of your teeth. 

Implant post

The post is a small, highly robust titanium screw placed directly into the jawbone structure. In discussions regarding your options, the post serves as the permanent foundation. Expert specialists at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey ensure this base osseointegrates perfectly to mimic a real tooth root.

Abutment

The abutment is a premium connector piece securely attached directly on top of the titanium post. When comparing clinical systems, the abutment serves as the critical structural bridge. Dentists at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey utilize this piece to provide a stable anchor for the final aesthetic crown.

Crown

The crown is the visible, custom-designed ceramic tooth that completely restores your natural biting surface. Whether evaluating structural tooth lines, the crown provides the ultimate visual transformation. The master ceramists at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey build these to match your exact natural enamel shade. Evaluating immediate vs traditional implants reveals that multi-teeth scenarios often utilize structured All-on-4 or All-on-6 configurations.

Why Dental Implants Are a Popular Tooth Replacement Solution

Biocompatible restorations provide unparalleled structural stability, completely preventing the bone loss that typically follows tooth loss. The global choice between Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants remains popular because implants look and feel completely natural. International patients routinely visit Vitrin Clinic in Turkey to access these permanent, life-changing lifestyle restorations.

Traditional Dental Implants Explained

The conventional approach to teeth replacement relies on a gradual, multi-phase timeline to guarantee maximum stability. Examining Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants shows that the conventional route allows the body ample time to heal. This time-tested method remains a highly reliable choice at premium centers like Vitrin Clinic in Turkey.

What Are Traditional Implants?

This classic methodology separates the tooth extraction, bone healing, implant placement, and crown attachment into distinct stages. Looking at clinical pathways, the conventional option prioritizes structural safety through a phased recovery timeline. The surgical team at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey recommends this for maximum long-term bone security.

Step-by-step procedure

The step-by-step procedure begins with an initial consultation and comprehensive 3D imaging to map out the jawbone structure. If a damaged tooth is still present, the first active step is its safe and gentle extraction. Following extraction, a healing period is provided to allow the bone tissue to settle and density to recover.

Tooth extraction (if needed)

The primary step involves carefully removing the damaged or decayed natural tooth structure from the socket. In the context of Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants, this extraction site is initially allowed to heal completely. The surgical team at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey performs this with absolute micro-surgical precision.

Healing period

Following extraction, the jawbone is left undisturbed for several weeks to rebuild its natural density. When analyzing surgical pathways, this empty healing window is unique to the classic conventional protocol. Specialized monitoring at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey ensures the tissue is perfectly prepped for subsequent stages.

Implant placement

Once the jawbone is fully recovered, the titanium screw is surgically embedded into the bone. Evaluating structural teeth highlights this step as the core surgical milestone of the process. The advanced surgical suites at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey utilize premium, globally recognized European titanium systems.

Osseointegration process

The titanium root requires several months to fuse permanently with the surrounding living bone tissue. In the timeline of Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants, this structural fusion forms an unbreakable foundation. Specialized healing protocols at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey guarantee that the implant achieves perfect stability before loading. The center provides a comprehensive range of surgical options, from single-tooth implants to full All-on-4 restorations.

Advantages of Traditional Implants

The multi-stage approach boasts a phenomenal historical success rate and allows for extensive bone grafting procedures. When weighing Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants, the classic path offers unparalleled predictability for complex clinical situations. Patients choosing this route at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey enjoy maximum peace of mind regarding long-term structural durability.

Disadvantages of Traditional Implants

The primary drawback of the conventional method is the extended overall time required to finish treatment. Evaluating dental systems reveals that the classic path requires multiple months of waiting. However, the dedicated international patient coordinators at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey design efficient travel itineraries to minimize disruption.

Healing Time and Treatment Duration

The entire conventional process generally spans anywhere from three to six months for complete recovery. In the direct comparison of Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants, this extended timeframe requires patience from the individual. Modern healing therapies applied at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey help optimize this biological recovery window safely.

Immediate Dental Implants Explained

Modern clinical innovations now allow patients to compress the traditional structural restoration timeline into a single day. Looking at Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants, the immediate method satisfies the modern demand for rapid aesthetic results. This advanced same-day alternative is readily available for eligible global travelers visiting Vitrin Clinic in Turkey. Pricing is one of the biggest reasons international patients research Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants before booking treatment at home — see our full dental implants cost in Turkey breakdown for exact figures by brand and case type.

What Are Immediate Implants?

This advanced medical protocol allows the surgeon to extract a tooth and place the post instantly. When studying clinical designs, this configuration skips the traditional multi-month waiting period entirely. The state-of-the-art diagnostic technologies at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey make this rapid procedure highly streamlined and safe.

How same-day implants work

The surgeon removes the failing tooth and immediately places the titanium post into the fresh extraction socket. Within the framework of Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants, a temporary crown is attached during that same visit. The digital CAD/CAM technology at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey creates these instant custom temporary teeth.

What's New in Same-Day Implant Technology

Same-day implant treatment continues to improve as chairside technology matures. CAD/CAM milling now produces a same-day provisional crown from a digital scan in under an hour, replacing the physical impressions and lab turnaround that once made temporary restorations less precise. CBCT-guided placement lets surgeons position the implant along a pre-planned digital path, reducing the guesswork that used to accompany immediate placement into a fresh extraction socket. Some clinics have also begun using implants embedded with stability sensors that give surgeons an objective stability reading in real time, rather than relying solely on manual assessment, an added layer of verification before deciding whether a same-day crown is appropriate for that specific case.

Advantages of Immediate Implants

Patients experience significantly fewer surgical interventions and leave the clinical chair with a functional tooth immediately. Looking closely at Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants, immediate loading drastically reduces overall psychological stress and cosmetic disruption. Choosing this advanced option at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey allows international travelers to complete treatments much faster.

Disadvantages of Immediate Implants

This accelerated protocol carries a slightly elevated risk of initial stability failure if the bone is weak. A systematic review and meta-analysis in the Journal of Clinical Periodontology comparing immediate to delayed single-tooth implant placement found a higher risk of early implant loss with the immediate approach, reinforcing why candidate selection matters more than convenience. In the debate of Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants, immediate loading demands absolute surgical precision and pristine bone. The highly trained, expert implantologists at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey carefully evaluate these parameters to avoid complications.

Who Is a Good Candidate for Immediate Implants?

An ideal candidate must possess exceptional natural bone density and completely healthy, infection-free surrounding gum tissue. When screening for Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants, patient eligibility is determined via comprehensive 3D jaw scans. The implant specialists at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey carefully select candidates to ensure exceptional long-term success.

Contraindications: When Immediate Implants Are Not Recommended

Certain conditions rule out same-day placement regardless of a patient's preference, since they directly threaten early osseointegration:

• Heavy smoking nicotine restricts blood flow to the healing socket and is one of the most consistent predictors of early implant failure.

• Uncontrolled diabetes poor glycemic control impairs bone healing and raises infection risk at the surgical site.

• Insufficient bone volume or density without adequate structure to stabilize the post immediately, grafting and a healing period are required first.

• Active infection at the extraction site placing an implant into infected tissue significantly increases the risk of early failure and complicates healing.

Patients with any of these factors are typically guided toward the traditional protocol, where the healing period allows these risks to be addressed before the implant is placed.

Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants (Key Differences)

Choosing the ideal tooth replacement strategy requires directly comparing the key clinical metrics of both popular techniques. The systematic breakdown of Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants highlights distinct variations in timing, cost, and biological healing. Evaluating these unique core parameters allows patients to align their dental care with their personal life goals.

Treatment Time Comparison

The conventional method requires multiple months and several separate visits to fully finish the crown restoration. When comparing the timelines of Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants, immediate procedures finish in a single session. International clients frequently select the rapid option at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey to maximize their travel schedules.

Healing and Recovery Differences

Conventional techniques allow the titanium post to fuse quietly beneath protected, stitched gum tissue for months. Analyzing biological recovery in Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants reveals that immediate loading places functional stress on the bone sooner. The specialized medical team at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey provides precise recovery protocols for both methods.

Cost Differences

Immediate placement involves specialized same-day components and sophisticated digital mapping software, which can alter the initial pricing. When reviewing financial plans for Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants, immediate options may require a higher upfront investment. However, package rates at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey make both treatments highly affordable. However, package rates at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey make both treatments highly affordable.

UK & Germany vs. Vitrin Clinic Turkey: Price Comparison

Pricing is one of the biggest reasons international patients research Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants before booking treatment at home. As an approximate 2026 range for a single implant including the abutment and crown, patients in the United Kingdom typically pay £1,800–£4,500, while patients in Germany typically pay €1,400–€3,500. Vitrin Clinic in Turkey offers the same internationally recognized implant brands, such as Nobel Biocare, at a significantly lower price point. Exact pricing always depends on the individual case, the implant brand selected, and whether bone grafting is needed.

This gap reflects differences in overhead, rent, and labor costs between markets rather than a difference in the titanium post or crown material itself. Patients comparing Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants abroad should always confirm exactly what a quoted price includes — imaging, the abutment, and the final crown are sometimes billed separately elsewhere. Package pricing at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey is structured to include these components together, along with travel coordination.

Success Rate Comparison

Both options maintain strong success rates when performed by qualified maxillofacial surgeons, though the research picture is more nuanced than "equally safe." A systematic review and meta-analysis published via NCBI/PMC pooling 700 implants found near-identical short-term survival 97.4% for immediate placement versus 97.5% for delayed placement. However, a 2025 Frontiers in Dental Medicine retrospective analysis of 1,500 implants followed for up to six years found the gap widens over time, with 6-year survival at 81.1% for delayed implants versus 53.2% for immediate implants, particularly in cases with less rigorous candidate screening. In the clinical comparison of Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants, this means the conventional route shows a more predictable long-term history, while immediate placement's outcomes depend heavily on how carefully the surgical team screens for bone quality and infection beforehand. The implant department at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey screens candidates against exactly these criteria before recommending either pathway.

Aesthetic Results Comparison

Both advanced techniques deliver an absolutely beautiful, indistinguishable smile when using premium, translucent porcelain materials. In terms of final beauty, comparing Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants shows identical high-end cosmetic outcomes. The master smile designers at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey ensure a seamless integration with your natural smile.

Immediate vs Traditional Implants Which One Is Better?

Determining the absolute best medical path depends entirely on your unique oral anatomy and individual lifestyle requirements. When deciding between immediate vs traditional implants, there is no generic, single correct answer for every patient. A comprehensive clinical consultation at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey is essential to discover your ideal structural pathway.

Factors That Influence Your Choice

A variety of anatomical, physiological, and personal lifestyle criteria dictate which surgical path is safest for you. Exploring immediate vs traditional implants requires a professional evaluation of your entire mouth's current health status. The medical staff at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey guides you through these crucial diagnostic metrics before surgery.

Bone health

The absolute volume, width, and structural density of your remaining jawbone form the ultimate basis for stability. When assessing immediate vs traditional implants, traditional methods are safer if bone volume requires significant grafting therapies. The digital bone-mapping systems at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey assess these tissue values with absolute accuracy.

Gum condition

The presence of active periodontal disease or localized gum recession can completely prohibit immediate post placement. In the selection of immediate vs traditional implants, healthy, uninfected pink gum tissue is mandatory for same-day loading. Periodontal specialists at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey work diligently to ensure your gums are in perfect condition.

Number of missing teeth

Replacing a single front tooth involves completely different aesthetic parameters than restoring an entire arch of teeth. Evaluating immediate vs traditional implants reveals that multi-teeth scenarios often utilize structured All-on-4 or All-on-6 configurations. Elite full-arch restorations are performed routinely with magnificent outcomes at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey.

Patient lifestyle and expectations

An individual's professional career demands, travel limitations, and personal lifestyle preferences heavily influence clinical choices. When choosing between immediate vs traditional implants, some patients prioritize speed, while others choose maximum multi-stage safety. The administrative team at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey treats your entire package with care. Whether an implant was placed traditionally or immediately, certain symptoms should prompt contact with a doctor — see our full guide on dental implant complications for a complete list of warning signs and when to seek help.

Case Example: How This Decision Plays Out in Practice

Tooth condition: A patient presented with a fractured upper front tooth and a failing old root canal, but with healthy surrounding gum tissue and no signs of active infection at the site.

Method chosen: Immediate placement with a temporary crown attached the same day, followed by a permanent crown several months later.

Why: CBCT imaging confirmed sufficient bone density and width to stabilize the post immediately, the extraction site showed no infection, and the patient's travel schedule allowed only one visit to Turkey. These factors together made immediate placement the appropriate choice rather than a generic preference for speed.

Outcome: The temporary crown was worn for the healing period while the post integrated with the bone, and the final porcelain crown was fitted afterward with no complications. This illustrates why candidacy, not convenience, should drive the decision between the two protocols.

Risks and Possible Complications

Every surgical medical intervention carries a small baseline percentage of potential healing risks and biological complications. Understanding the risks of Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants allows patients to make fully informed healthcare choices. Choosing a highly experienced clinical center like Vitrin Clinic in Turkey drastically minimizes these potential surgical issues.

Risks of Traditional Implants

Potential complications include localized post-operative infection, minor temporary nerve discomfort, or slow initial bone osseointegration. When exploring the risks of Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants, conventional complications are usually easily managed over the phased timeline. The clinical nursing staff at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey provides comprehensive, continuous support during recovery.

Risks of Immediate Implants

The primary risk involves early implant micromovement, which can completely disrupt the delicate initial osseointegration process. In the risk profile of Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants, immediate loading requires absolute compliance with soft-food rules. The surgical specialists at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey utilize advanced primary-stability measuring tools to prevent failure.

Warning Signs Your Implant May Be Failing

Whether an implant was placed traditionally or immediately, certain symptoms should prompt contact with a Doctor rather than waiting to see if they resolve on their own:

• Persistent pain or throbbing around the implant site beyond the expected early healing window

• Visible looseness or movement of the implant post or crown when touched or biting down

• Gum recession that exposes metal at the base of the crown

• Swelling, redness, or pus around the implant, which can indicate peri-implantitis

• Difficulty chewing on the implant side, or a noticeable change in how the bite feels

Recovery and Aftercare

Adhering to a strict, professionally guided recovery protocol is absolutely vital to protect your new titanium roots. Proper aftercare for Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants ensures the surrounding bone tissue heals with zero underlying inflammation. The hygiene department at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey provides exhaustive, customized post-op recovery manuals to every patient.

Aftercare for Traditional Implants

During the early stages, patients must keep the stitched gum area meticulously clean using specialized antibacterial mouth rinses. When managing aftercare for Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants, the classic path requires regular checkups over several months. International tele-health coordination at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey allows you to track healing progress from home. Finally, a custom-made ceramic crown is securely placed over the abutment, perfectly restoring the visible biting surface and aesthetic look of your teeth.

Aftercare for Immediate Implants

Because a temporary tooth is attached instantly, patients must protect that specific area from direct biting forces. When following aftercare for Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants, immediate loading requires a highly disciplined temporary soft-food diet. The nutritional advisors at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey outline delicious, safe dietary options for your recovery.

Oral hygiene guidelines

Patients must gently brush the surrounding teeth while completely avoiding direct mechanical scrubbing of fresh surgical wounds. When reviewing hygiene structures, maintaining a bacteria-free mouth prevents painful peri-implantitis infections. Oral health educators at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey demonstrate precise flossing techniques for implants.

Foods to avoid during healing

Hard candies, tough meats, crunchy vegetables, and crusty bread can easily dislodge a healing implant post. In the dietary rules of clinical health, protecting the healing site from heavy forces is mandatory. The culinary guidance provided at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey helps safeguard your investment during healing.

Why Dental Consultation Is Important Before Choosing

A successful, lifetime dental restoration cannot be guessed or completed without expert diagnostic oversight and clear visualization. Deliberating between Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants requires a deep clinical look inside your unique jawbone anatomy. Booking an initial diagnostic appointment at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey guarantees you select the safest treatment path.

Diagnostic Tests and Imaging

Surgeons utilize cutting-edge Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) to capture highly detailed 3D cross-sections of bone. When diagnosing structural health, these advanced high-resolution images prevent hitting nerves or sinuses. The diagnostic radiology department at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey provides these crucial state-of-the-art scans instantly. The post is a small, highly robust titanium dental implant placed directly into the jawbone structure.

Personalized Treatment Planning

An elite dental plan maps out the exact angle, depth, and size of the implant post virtually. When designing a routine for clinical treatment, personalized planning ensures the tooth looks entirely natural. The digital design technicians at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey customize every parameter to match your facial profile.

Dr. Rifat Alsaman's Clinical View

As Head of the Medical Team at Vitrin Clinic, Dr. Rifat Alsaman reviews every immediate implant case personally before it is scheduled. His clinical position on Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants is straightforward: the decision should never be made to satisfy a travel itinerary, it should be made to satisfy what the bone and gum tissue can actually support on the day of surgery.

In his assessment, the single biggest predictor of long-term success is not which protocol a patient prefers, but whether primary stability can be measured and confirmed at the moment the post is placed. When that stability is present, along with healthy tissue and no active infection, immediate placement performs reliably. When it is uncertain, he recommends the traditional route without hesitation, since a few additional months of healing carries far less risk than forcing an implant into bone that cannot yet support it.

Dr. Alsaman also notes that patients frequently arrive having already decided on immediate placement based on marketing rather than diagnostics. Part of his role, and the role of the wider medical team at Vitrin Clinic, is to re-center that decision around the CBCT scan and clinical exam rather than the calendar.

Vitrin Clinic : Modern Dental Implant Solutions

Premium dental care combines world-class clinical expertise with the warm, luxurious hospitality found in modern dental tourism. Patients seeking to compare Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants travel globally to access the unparalleled standards at Vitrin Clinic. Located in the beautiful country of Turkey, this facility redefines the modern patient experience completely.

Overview of Implant Services at Vitrin Clinic

The center provides a comprehensive range of surgical options, from single-tooth replacements to full All-on-4 restorations. For those researching options, this facility provides top-tier international standard systems like Nobel Biocare. Every single treatment package at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey includes luxury transport and translations. As Head of the Medical Team at Vitrin Clinic, Dr. Rifat Alsaman reviews every immediate implant case personally — learn more about the full team of implant specialists who evaluate each case at Vitrin Clinic.

Approach to Traditional and Immediate Implants

The clinical philosophy prioritizes long-term bone health, absolute facial symmetry, and incredibly natural-looking porcelain results. Whether your case requires Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants, the team focuses on achieving a healthy, lifelong smile. The implant surgeons at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey balance speed with maximum safety perfectly.

Focus on Patient Comfort and Advanced Technology

The treatment suites are fully equipped with advanced painless dental lasers, sedation options, and ultra-quiet dental equipment. When undergoing surgery for clinical improvements, patient anxiety is completely eliminated through compassionate, empathetic care. Discovering relaxed dentistry at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey makes your smile journey exceptionally smooth. Booking an initial diagnostic appointment through a free consultation at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey guarantees you select the safest treatment path.

Treatment Planning and Digital Dentistry Approach

The integration of advanced CAD/CAM milling and digital intraoral scanning eliminates messy, uncomfortable traditional mouth molds. Planning your journey for Traditional vs Immediate Dental Implants is handled entirely inside an advanced computerized digital environment. This high-tech infrastructure at Vitrin Clinic in Turkey guarantees perfect accuracy and gorgeous aesthetics.

References

• Cosyn, J., De Lat, L., Seyssens, L., Doornewaard, R., Deschepper, E., & Vervaeke, S. (2019). The effectiveness of immediate implant placement for single tooth replacement compared to delayed implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Ghent University, Belgium. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30624808/

• Chatzopoulos, G. S., & Wolff, L. F. (2025). Assessing the long-term survival of dental implants in a retrospective analysis: Immediate versus delayed placement. University of Minnesota, USA & Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11885415/

• Cheng, et al. (2025). Influencing factors and survival rates in immediate vs. delayed dental implant placement: A six-year retrospective analysis. Sun Yat-sen University, China. Frontiers in Dental Medicine. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/dental-medicine/articles/10.3389/fdmed.2025.1563641/full